It seems like a contradiction. You have erection problems but go to see prostitutes.
But I would say it's very common for various reasons. There is always pleasure in so called "sex" but you have to get hard first, or you can't get in or cum. In a sense there is no different from doing it with your wife or a prostitute. One thing is certain, a girl friend isn't that happy to "help" you. It's only evolution that women should drop unhealthy mates. So compensating women in this case is useful.
The other reason is to be able to go over sex at will. Say if you go abroad for a sex tour, or a rock festival. If you take a week or two off to a sex tourist destination, you would want to do it everyday to offset the per pussy cost. It may or may not work. And you never know but people just do that.
The common reason is to get your money's worth. It is used by younger people to improve their quality of erection (hardness) and duration. It's a recreation drug. But with such potent drug, you really shouldn't take it if you have no problems. Honestly I saw the veins on my penis becomes more visible over time. But the veins on my legs should also becomes with age.
For me it's slightly more complicated. I normally have no problem of erection with a sexy woman, especially if she seduces me a little. Looking for prostitutes is a lot complicated here with it being illegal. In the beginning I have to drive an hour to get them, incall or outcall. Or I'll risk being ripp-off, or tolerate the high price and low quality.
If I am horny when I started, when I arrived at the scene I may be deflated. Sometimes I got delays in the traffic. After an hour or more in the traffic you are not in the condition to do greatness.
May be I look younger than my abilities. Even if mature girls offer me a drink beforehand, they are rushing me to get naked and get started. They are afraid that I will run out of time. I would rather they seduces me partially naked until I am hot and hard, then I can be quick and intense. The other thing is protocol. If you paid, naked and started sex, then they can be sure that you are not corps and mostly harmless.
For full service massage parlors, you may have to wait for somebody or wait for your favorite. And you may have to go elsewhere that may be a drive away. The timing is hard to control.
In hand job factories, you have a set time of 30 or 60 minutes. So it's good to last that long before they finish you off at the end. Even in legit massage parlors, I like to show off my erect penis to my favorite girl, usually the prettiest of all the joints, even though she have to cover it up. It's really hard to do that because they are not stimulating you, but calming you down with excellent massage.
That is my specification. So Cialis is out of the question. When I return home, I don't want to get an erection the next day when I see my wife in the shower, only for her to refuse sex. If you go out to play again that's twice the expenses. I can handle my hooker addiction well. I normally visit one no more than once a week, and sometimes go on without one for weeks and months. I will think of it, but also thinking of what else I can do with the money.
Of course I tried Viagra and then Levitra when it came out. Viagra is supposed to take effect in about 30 min in empty stomach. Levitra is supposed to be a little faster and works well after meal. So for me it's a no brainer. My favorite time is sneaking out after lunch to play when nobody is looking for me. And faster is always good.
And personally I agree that Viagra is more intense. Maybe I felt hotter when I first try these things, that's Viagra. And have a mild headache.
It's probably true that Viagra gives you a harder erection. But for me what's the point. As long as I can get in, that's hard enough. It doesn't help with prolonging ejaculation. And am I supposed to please the "woman"? They are more pleased if I don't work them that hard.
WebMD actually says that Viagra is faster. May be true, but probably on empty stomach.
Another thing is the cutting. I read one guy saying that the big blue pill is easy to cut. All pills with different doses cost the same. So cutting a high dose pill into two or four saves you a lot of money. But I think Levitra is easier. First it doesn't have a hard blue crust and a slippery shape. Levitra is like a normal pill, small but just what pill cutters are for. As with most pills, it is flat so it is easier to align your cutter blade. It's almost perfect if you want to cut the Levitra pill in half. I cut it in quarters. The 2nd cut is normally not as good. More like crushing than clean cutting. But after cutting, I can suck up the pill dust like cocaine. Also, even a small than normal quarter "works" for me. And works for me is slightly complicated as stated above.
That's about all the comparisons. But regular usage as a recreation drug is another interesting thing to share.
No comments:
Post a Comment